The source used in the last two insertions is in Polish, despite my belief that the claim relates to a publication in Financial Times, an English-language paper.

Since the material is not in the article, we can hardly include it in the summary of the article. The material has been added to the lead, which is supposed to serve as an introduction to the article and a summary of its most important contents.

It seems clear to me this doesn't belong there, but the IP user who has added it, three times now ( 1, 2, 3), hasn't understood my objections in my edit summaries. It's about the repeated addition to the lead of something about ZГјrich and WrocЕ‚aw. No, this section isn't about a revolutionary new cream you can use to clean! and polish! your car, your boat, everything in your home with. JohnFromPinckney ( talk / edits) 21:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Something Polish Spekkios, please read through all of the move discussions linked in the header right above this section, and browse through the archives for other discussions not linked. I'm tempted to open a move request, which I will do unless there is a discussion about the name - Spekkios ( talk) 20:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC) Before you do.

However, itВґs likely that RP speakers would use initial /zj/. The only pronunciation I have heard IN ENGLISH is /zurЙЄk/. More likely, this last clause was inserted and misrepresents what Jones says. I am also sceptical of the claim that Daniel Jones (1997) says that the name is more recently pronounced with initial 'ts', as in German. Check any English-language news source and you will find 'Zurich', not 'ZГјrich'. What do you think? - tooki ( talk) 17:04, 12 October 2020 (UTC)ДЄs a native speaker of English and a second-language speaker of German, I completely agree with Michael Bateman and tooki. I'd love to have a re-vote on moving this article (and all the rest with Zurich in the name) back to 'Zurich'. Zurich is clearly still predominantly spelled 'Zurich' in English. Michael Bateman ( talk) 21:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC) I completely agree with you. Dusseldorf is the normal English version of DГјsseldorf, just as Zurich is normal English for ZГјrich. Standard English practice for German names is NOT 'to either preserve the umlaut or replace it with the base letter followed by e'. The default English spelling of the city is still Zurich with no umlaut, as evidenced by Google's counting: ZГјrich shows 135,000,000 results, while Zurich shows 488,000,000 results.Дў. Zuerich).' This assertion is incorrect on two counts:ДЎ. Even so, standard English practice for German names is to either preserve the umlaut or replace it with the base letter followed by e (i.e. In the Name section of the article, we currently read, 'In English, the name used to be written as Zurich, without the umlaut. No consensus, November 30, 2021, from ZГјrich to Zurich, see discussion.No consensus, September 3, 2013, from ZГјrich to Zurich, see discussion.Endorsed, August 24, 2013, from MRV, Zurich to ZГјrich, see discussion.Moved, August 16, 2013, from Zurich to ZГјrich, see discussion.

Moved, December 3, 2010, from ZГјrich to Zurich, see discussion.

This page has previously been nominated to be moved. This article has been selected for Version 0.5 and subsequent release versions of Wikipedia.

Zurich font google